DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
EGA
Docket No: 5631-14
1 July 2015
pear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
Although your application was not filed in a timely manner, the
Board found it in the interest of justice to waive the statute
of limitations and consider your application on its merits.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 19 May 2015. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations
of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with
administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on
15 February 1996. You served without disciplinary incident
until 15 August 1996, when you received an involuntary discharge
due to a severe personality disorder that existed prior to entry
into military service. At that time, your condition was not a
physical disability and you received an uncharacterized entry
level separation.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your desire to upgrade your characterization of service and
change your narrative reason for separation. Nevertheless, the
Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant
relief in your case because of your pre-existing personality
disorder and inability to complete your service obligations.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board within one year from the date of the Board’s decision.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | nr3819 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 April 2015. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reentry or separation codes given the diagnosis of a dependent personality disorder, and the fact that you represented a danger to yourself and others. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1630 14
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing your characterization of service given your diagnoses of a personality disorder, and suicidal ideation, | Accordingly, your application has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2426 14
three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Fecords, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 © March 2015... case because of the diagnosed personality disorder - -and your misconduct, which resulted in NJP. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9622 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2015. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were insufficient to warrant relief in your case because Navy regulations state, in part, that Sailors serving in paygrade E-3 who have been diagnosed with a medical and/or mental condition, such as a personality disorder, and who have served for less than 180 days of active duty, must receive an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1286 14
Although your application was not filed in a timely manner, the Board found it in the interest of justice to waive the statute 'o limitations and consider your application on its merits, A three-member panel of the ‘Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on ° 24 February 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05629-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 26 October 1995 at age 17 and served without disciplinary incident.On 4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4417 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Based on the psychological evaluation, your Commanding officer did not © recommend you for retention and recommended’ you for separation by reason of convenience of the government due to personality Gisorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR517 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Additionally, you were counseled and warned after your first NJP, that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5104 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2015. Navy regulations authorize an uncharacterized entry level separation if the processing of a Sailor’s separation begins within 180 days of his entry on active auty Accordingly, your application has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03855-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 February 2011. Nevertheless, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reentry code due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.